<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Blue (Da Ba Dee)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cjmills.me/2008/11/im-blue-da-ba-dee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cjmills.me/2008/11/im-blue-da-ba-dee/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 00:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent(inWorship)</title>
		<link>http://www.cjmills.me/2008/11/im-blue-da-ba-dee/comment-page-1/#comment-3381</link>
		<dc:creator>brent(inWorship)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualtrademark.com/?p=615#comment-3381</guid>
		<description>Site looks good! So does your boy!

Here is an option for you on the Firefox issue.

From a user forum...

&quot;“If the digital photo you just uploaded looks washed out on Flickr compared to in your desktop image editor, that’s because Firefox 3’s advanced color profile support isn’t turned on. To enable it, type about:config in Firefox 3’s address bar, then click the “I’ll be careful, I promise!” button. Then, in the Filter field, type gfx.color_management.enabled and set that value to true (its default value is false). Restart Firefox. From there on in, your photo colors will be richer than they were. Why isn’t this value true by default? Well, according to Mozilla, you’ll see a 10-15% performance hit using this setting, but if you’ve got a reasonably fast machine, it’ll be worth the better-looking photos. Hit the link below for an extended explanation of Firefox’s color profile support.&quot;

I&#039;ve done this and it is better. Maybe a bit washed out, but much closer.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;b&gt;brent(inWorship)´s last blog post...&lt;a href=&quot;http://brentinworship.com/blog/2008/11/take-this-verse-and-shove-it/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Take This Verse and Shove It&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site looks good! So does your boy!</p>
<p>Here is an option for you on the Firefox issue.</p>
<p>From a user forum&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;“If the digital photo you just uploaded looks washed out on Flickr compared to in your desktop image editor, that’s because Firefox 3’s advanced color profile support isn’t turned on. To enable it, type about:config in Firefox 3’s address bar, then click the “I’ll be careful, I promise!” button. Then, in the Filter field, type gfx.color_management.enabled and set that value to true (its default value is false). Restart Firefox. From there on in, your photo colors will be richer than they were. Why isn’t this value true by default? Well, according to Mozilla, you’ll see a 10-15% performance hit using this setting, but if you’ve got a reasonably fast machine, it’ll be worth the better-looking photos. Hit the link below for an extended explanation of Firefox’s color profile support.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done this and it is better. Maybe a bit washed out, but much closer.</p>
<p><abbr><em><b>brent(inWorship)´s last blog post&#8230;<a href="http://brentinworship.com/blog/2008/11/take-this-verse-and-shove-it/" rel="nofollow">Take This Verse and Shove It</a></b></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.cjmills.me/2008/11/im-blue-da-ba-dee/comment-page-1/#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualtrademark.com/?p=615#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>@Brad Ruggles » you were the only one that caught that reference... (or the only one that admitted it....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brad Ruggles » you were the only one that caught that reference&#8230; (or the only one that admitted it&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Ruggles</title>
		<link>http://www.cjmills.me/2008/11/im-blue-da-ba-dee/comment-page-1/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Ruggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualtrademark.com/?p=615#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>Oooh, loving the blue! Very nice job!

And, now you&#039;ve got the Eiffel 65 song stuck in my head for the rest of the day. Thanks.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;b&gt;Brad Ruggles´s last blog post...&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradruggles/~3/443299553/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;History In The Making&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, loving the blue! Very nice job!</p>
<p>And, now you&#8217;ve got the Eiffel 65 song stuck in my head for the rest of the day. Thanks.</p>
<p><abbr><em><b>Brad Ruggles´s last blog post&#8230;<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bradruggles/~3/443299553/" rel="nofollow">History In The Making</a></b></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.cjmills.me/2008/11/im-blue-da-ba-dee/comment-page-1/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualtrademark.com/?p=615#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>LOL..you should see me staring at the two screen shots.. I cant see a difference.. I must be color blind..haha.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;b&gt;Adam´s last blog post...&lt;a href=&quot;http://adamchristopherowens.blogspot.com/2008/11/weekend-recap.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Weekend Recap...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL..you should see me staring at the two screen shots.. I cant see a difference.. I must be color blind..haha.</p>
<p><abbr><em><b>Adam´s last blog post&#8230;<a href="http://adamchristopherowens.blogspot.com/2008/11/weekend-recap.html" rel="nofollow">Weekend Recap&#8230;</a></b></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.cjmills.me/2008/11/im-blue-da-ba-dee/comment-page-1/#comment-3316</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualtrademark.com/?p=615#comment-3316</guid>
		<description>I like your colors, looking good.

Yeah the color difference between the two is quite interesting. It was pissing me off so bad one day that I decided to find out what the deal was. I found that most images on the web have an embedded color calibration thingy. (something photoshop has done) Safari reads this but firefox does not.

you can take out the color calibration thing but then everything is washed out on all browser. Seems like we can never win.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;b&gt;Randy´s last blog post...&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.visualcoma.com/2008/11/02/the-cycle-of-construction/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Cycle Of Construction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your colors, looking good.</p>
<p>Yeah the color difference between the two is quite interesting. It was pissing me off so bad one day that I decided to find out what the deal was. I found that most images on the web have an embedded color calibration thingy. (something photoshop has done) Safari reads this but firefox does not.</p>
<p>you can take out the color calibration thing but then everything is washed out on all browser. Seems like we can never win.</p>
<p><abbr><em><b>Randy´s last blog post&#8230;<a href="http://www.visualcoma.com/2008/11/02/the-cycle-of-construction/" rel="nofollow">The Cycle Of Construction</a></b></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

